The Comfort of Limits
There’s a strange kind of peace in limits. Perhaps because they remind us that everything, even the sense of freedom, needs a form. In architecture, as in life, constraints are not just barriers, but what allows thought to become design: the wall that defines space, the rule that guides creativity, the time that sets an end. We thought it was restriction; it’s really a matter of rhythm.

The limit as a frame
The Finnish architect and designer Alvar Aalto once said that architecture is born from respect for the material, and that material, by its nature, imposes a limit.
Think of the possible curvature of wood, the resistance of brick, the transparency of glass. It is the material itself, with its rules and its resistance, that turns an idea into form. The same applies to the mind: neuroscience shows that a finite number of possibilities enhances focus and reduces decision stress. Too many options, too many openings, and the brain short-circuits. The limit, then, becomes a cognitive ally, the condition that enables us to choose, to order, to create.
Containing to breathe
What if it were a matter of reversing our perspective? We live in a culture that constantly asks us to expand: to produce more, connect more, open up ever more. And yet, true wellbeing often stems from containment. Like in a Japanese Zen garden, where the boundary doesn’t close but directs the gaze, workspaces too can be conceived as limited yet generative ecosystems: not everything everywhere, but the right things where they are needed. Take a familiar thought: “How nice, now I can work from the sofa.” But do we really work well from that sofa? Total freedom only works as long as there is a context that holds it: a stretch of time, a posture, a threshold that distinguishes work from what is not. Context means constraint — some things I can do, others I can’t — and precisely for that reason I can focus, produce, and finally, breathe.
Measure as a creative act
There’s beauty in designing with measure: deciding where to stop, how much space to leave, how much time to dedicate. It’s an ethical gesture before it is an aesthetic one. The limit becomes a sign of care, a threshold that protects us first and foremost from ourselves.
And perhaps true luxury today is living within a considered perimeter, a space that doesn’t push us towards infinity, but invites us to find our own form of stillness. Let’s say it together: absolute freedom disorients; the right limit embraces.
The Science of Belonging
In one scene from Good Will Hunting (1997), an intense Robin Williams, in the role of the therapist, says to a very young Matt Damon:
“You’re afraid of what you might become if you let someone in.”
It’s not just a line about an untameable genius. It’s a line about trust: about how complex it is to grant it, to open up, to find your own place. At work, it happens all the time. We move between teams, calls, shared projects, and yet often remain on the emotional margins of what we build. Because to truly belong means allowing ourselves to be seen with our voice, our vulnerability, our presence. And we are not always willing to do that.

More than empathy: psychological safety
This is where the concept of psychological safety comes in, coined in 1999 by Amy Edmondson, Professor of Leadership and Management at Harvard: the belief that a group performs better when everyone feels free to speak up, make mistakes, propose ideas. Safety, not comfort. It’s not about eliminating risk, but about creating a context in which risk is sustainable. Where trust becomes a platform rather than a vague promise. If the fear of being judged shuts expression down, the certainty of being able to contribute multiplies it. It is precisely from this awareness that Emotion Based Working (EBW) was born: the approach developed by Altis to design spaces starting from the emotions they are meant to sustain. EBW turns what is often intangible into method: the relationship between architecture and emotional states. Designing places where people feel they belong, therefore, means giving shape to trust, empathy and shared identity.
Measuring the immeasurable
So can we measure “feeling part of something”? To some extent, yes. Neuroscience talks about hormones such as oxytocin and dopamine; psychology speaks of motivation; marketing of engagement. But the truest indicator remains human: the spontaneous willingness to stay, to contribute, to take care. In Altis projects, this translates into spaces that encourage encounters, but also individual recognition. Shared areas, yes, but also personal niches: because collective belonging can only be built if everyone can find their own place, physically and emotionally.
Belonging, in the end, is not a state. It is a verb in constant conjugation. A daily, quiet practice of caring for context. Because no open space, on its own, is enough to make us feel part of something, but a space designed around people can still make us say, with sincerity, “I feel good here.”
If this reflection feels even a little like yours, write to us at [email protected] and let’s talk about it.
A Mental Maintenance Manual
Before you dive into this article, let’s run a quick check: a kind of inner service, in the form of an (almost) serious checklist to consult whenever you feel you’re overheating.
1) Notifications off, or are you still working inside the noise?
2) Inbox at zero, energy at zero too? Time for a reboot
3) If your chair squeaks… maybe it’s just you needing to stretch
4) Last mental pause: can’t remember? Then you’re overdue for one
5) Staring at the screen for clarity rarely brings clarity
6) Your brain runs on oxygen, not caffeine
7) A five-minute walk can solve what a one-hour meeting can’t
8) Multitasking: the fastest way to do three things badly at once
9) Silence isn’t empty, it’s part of the system reset
10) If you’re reading this during a meeting, congratulations, you’ve just found the most productive minute of it
If at least one of these lines has triggered a thought, it might be worth looking a little deeper. Because every day architecture designs spaces, inspects systems, checks certifications and safety protocols, but is it really able to maintain the minds that inhabit them? The brain, after all, is a precision machine. And like any machine, if it isn’t cared for, it breaks down.

Thinking, version 2.0
In engineering, preventive maintenance is the set of actions that help avoid a breakdown. Translated into the world of work, it means learning to spot the signals before they turn into blocks: information overload, loss of focus, pointless meetings, chronic multitasking. Altis also works on this plane, the plane of cognitive design, because a space only truly works if the people inside it are able to function well. Mental maintenance is, in every respect, both a technical and a human act: a regular check-up of the way we think, collaborate, act.
Lubricating the circuits
Like oil in an engine, the mind needs fluidity. Short, regular breaks; changes of posture; natural light; micro-movements: elements design can encourage and neuroscience confirms as essential to performance. Thinking does not regenerate under constant stress: it needs controlled friction and cooling points. Quiet areas, decompression routines and moments of recalibration, even a simple conscious breath, are all part of everyday maintenance.
Repairing, not replacing
In industry, the instinct is to replace what no longer works. With people, it’s smarter (and more ethical) to repair. Mental maintenance means recognising friction: a team that communicates poorly, a leadership that’s always “on”, an organisation that leaves no room for recovery, and intervening with precision, not punishment. It’s a shift in paradigm: from the cult of productivity to a culture of longevity.
Mental maintenance is an act of design care that Altis considers part of its method: Consult, Design, Deliver, useful especially when the construction site is still in our minds. To find out more, write to us at [email protected].
Through the window, beyond
If we asked Alfred Hitchcock for his idea of a window, he would probably focus less on aesthetics and more on perception. In “Rear Window” (1954) the window becomes a narrative threshold: it tells of the obsession with looking out, and the illusion that life is always more interesting on the other side of the glass.
And how much time do we spend looking out of the window? A universal gesture, full of breath and freedom, that we perform to carve out a moment of pause and escape. The window, in the office as at home, is not just a fixture: it is an emotional command, our own Ctrl+Alt+View. A tool that changes the way we work, think and even perceive ourselves.

Looking out as mental training
The point is that gazing outside interrupts the spiral of multitasking and opens up a new mental space. Neuroscience confirms it: looking out lowers cortisol levels, stimulates lateral creativity, and reduces the perception of stress. It’s not a whim, it’s biochemistry. Unsurprisingly, companies that invest in panoramic offices report better engagement and performance.
From the corner office to the basement
But not all windows are equal. We know it: some look out onto postcard-perfect skylines, others onto car parks or concrete walls. Yet the brain still plays its part. Any visual link with the outside, even a scraggy tree or a crow on the ledge, works as a reminder that the world goes on beyond the Excel file in front of us. It’s not just about the view, but about the possibility of an horizon, of perceiving the ‘beyond’ (we know, it may sound a bit New Age… but it makes perfect sense).
When the window is missing
And when there are no windows, the eye invents them: a graffiti on the wall, a tropical screensaver, even a brightly lit corridor can become substitute horizons. Do they work? Only up to a point. Without natural light and a visual link to the outside, productivity drops and psychological wellbeing takes a hit. That’s why the issue is not just aesthetic, but design-related: rethinking workplaces also means deciding how and where to open windows.
The window, then, is much more than a view on the world: it is an interface between inside and outside, between focus and escape, between the everyday and the dream. It does not solve all the problems of contemporary work, true. But it remains a fundamental element of our daily wellbeing. For everything else, Hitchcock’s lesson still holds: the outside we observe is only a pretext, because the real scene always takes place inside us.
The Hidden Site
Every architectural project has two faces: the one on show, made of forms and materials, and the one that stays backstage. We’re not talking cranes and hard hats, but that grey area of permits, logistical dovetailing, teams co-existing and the management of the unexpected. It’s the invisible side of building: the part that never appears in the renderings yet decides a project’s fate.

Bureaucracy is not a detail (No, really.)
Forget reinforced concrete: the first real wall is paper. Stamps, authorisations, regulations. Not the most glamorous bit, granted, but without it nothing moves. And ticking boxes isn’t enough: you need to read the system’s fine print, anticipate friction, use the rules of the game as your compass. In other words, the legal backstage is already part of the project.
Logistics: the Tetris no one imagines
A building site isn’t just construction: it’s a choreography of materials, equipment and people. When logistics work, no one notices; when they don’t, everyone remembers. The backstage is an exercise in synchronicity: coordinating suppliers, managing access, keeping to schedules. A less tangible art, but a decisive one.
The unexpected isn’t unexpected
In theory they’re obstacles; in practice, they’re the norm. Delays, supply errors, structural surprises: every site knows them. The difference lies in preparation. Reading complexities early, anticipating criticalities and steering them through to handover is what separates a loosely organised approach from a solid one. We call it Consult – Design – Delivery, and it works because it sequences what usually stays disconnected: we read real requirements and the context’s rules before we draw, we design choices that simplify logistics and reduce snags, and in delivery we coordinate timing, players and surprises under a single direction.
If you’d like to see how Altis keeps the visible and the invisible sides of a project together, write to [email protected]
Open Plan, Closed Minds?
Chairs that swivel, desks without borders, and the promise of endless brainstorming. That’s how the open space was sold: the ultimate solution to make companies more collaborative, dynamic, “cool”. And the reality? The soundtrack is noise, distractions, loud phone calls, and noise-cancelling headphones as the only form of self-defence.
The open space has become the standard, but that doesn’t mean it always works. In fact… often the opposite is true.

The myth of perpetual collaboration
In the 1990s and 2000s, open spaces embodied an almost utopian vision of the office: no walls, no barriers, just colleagues ready to share ideas as if they were sweets. In theory, the formula was simple: more proximity = more collaboration. In practice, more proximity = more coffee breaks and chit-chat. The myth of spontaneous interaction has often turned into a trap: the open plan doesn’t guarantee exchange, but interruptions.
White noise or black noise?
The problem is not just organisational, but cognitive. Every interruption breaks what we might call “attentional cycles”: a recent study from Toggl Blog suggests it takes on average 23 minutes to regain focus after a distraction. Multiply that by ten micro-distractions a day and it’s clear why phone booths have become the status symbol of the open office. The promise of collective energy easily turns into white noise, on a good day, or black noise, the kind that burns time and patience.
Not open vs closed, but plural
The point is not to choose between walls or open spaces. The issue is more subtle: designing environments that respect people’s different cognitive and emotional registers. Some need isolation to concentrate, others thrive on sharing to generate ideas, others on movement to find energy.
This is where our approach, Emotion Based Working, comes in: reading and designing spaces starting from the emotions they must sustain, not from the architectural dogma of the moment. There is no single model, but an ecosystem of possibilities. Closed rooms, hybrid areas, private corners, fluid zones: the real office is not a spatial dogma, but a set of conscious choices.
Do we want to admit it or not?
The open space was the symbol of an era, probably over. Working well today means creating environments that know when to open and when to close. Because in the end, true collaboration goes far beyond desk layouts: it is born from the design of a space that respects different ways of thinking and working.
And if this topic intrigues you, write to us at [email protected]. we promise a conversation more stimulating than an improvised brainstorming session at the coffee machine.
Are you ready for a new era of work?
September: the month of new beginnings, and the perfect time to put a well-worn concept back under the microscope, Activity Based Working (ABW). Flexible, inspiring, motivating… on paper. But what happens today, in a landscape of hybrid realities and generations who approach work in an increasingly subjective and emancipated way?
You may have noticed it too: a few cracks are showing. And since, as the saying goes, “three clues make a proof,” we’ve pulled out three key data points from Altis’ Proprietary Research that show why it’s time to rethink the model as we know it.

First clue: from flexibility to fragmentation
ABW was born with a promise: more freedom, fewer fixed desks, more collaboration. Yet the post-pandemic reality has handed us a paradox: 55% of Gen Z say they feel lonely or struggle to build social relationships (McKinsey). If the office fails to act as a human glue, flexibility risks turning into fragmentation, because more freedom doesn’t automatically mean more wellbeing.
Second clue: productivity, but only up to a point
Studies on ABW show gains in physical activity and satisfaction, but also small dips in productivity. We move more, we feel better… but do we really work better? It’s the classic trade-off: the environment encourages interaction and movement, but without a design calibrated on people, it risks slowing processes instead of speeding them up.
Third clue: ROI is no longer just about real estate
For years ABW was adopted to cut workstations and optimise square metres. Today, however, ROI means looking beyond occupancy: mental health, engagement, the quality of interactions. In a hybrid world, the true value of space isn’t “how many desks you save,” but “how many connections you generate.”
The proof: taking a step forward with EBW
This is why at Altis we talk about Emotion Based Working. Not just a catchy acronym, but a solid approach rooted in both data and people. At its core lies our Proprietary Research, which explores the relationship between space and behaviour, investigating how the physical environment influences emotional states and social dynamics inside the workplace. This way, every project is grounded in scientific evidence and a true understanding of how space can improve both wellbeing and productivity.
Because today’s work is shaped more by emotions than by mere activity. And it’s time to design places that reflect this reality, without nostalgia for old models, and with one key insight in mind: the next “upgrade” in work won’t be purely technological, but emotional.
The rest of the story? Write to us at [email protected]. We’ll tell you more.
When architecture stops pleasing us
We’re used to thinking of space as a loyal ally: it welcomes you, protects you, makes life easier. That’s the dominant narrative of contemporary architecture: “user-friendly” and “human-centred.” But what if it isn’t? What if architecture is also full of limits, constraints and compromises?
And it’s often there that creativity finds its way through.

Space is not our servant
We’ve asked buildings to become ever more accommodating: quiet when we need concentration, flexible when we need collaboration, even “emotional”, at least from the renderings onwards. But this endless pursuit of service-oriented architecture risks turning sterile. An effective space isn’t necessarily a servile one: sometimes it’s an interlocutor. A counterpart with an opinion of its own, inviting us to experience different forms of living. Think of the staircases at MAXXI in Rome, or the loft craze that reshaped the entire SoHo district in Manhattan. Serviceable spaces? Hardly. Useful spaces? Absolutely. A building can force us to imagine different solutions, and that, too, can be its value.
Friction as a resource
A corridor that’s too narrow, a shadow that always falls in the wrong place, a material that ages faster than expected: annoyances? Perhaps. But also stimuli. Because friction isn’t just discomfort: it’s the resistance that pushes us to move, to change direction, to invent new solutions. Living is always a negotiation: if we want oak flooring, we know it will inevitably bear the marks of time. There’s no way around it: natural materials absorb the traces of daily life.
Against the illusion of “tailor-made”
We live in the age of extreme personalisation, but space doesn’t always need to follow the same logic. The illusion of the “perfectly customised” risks reducing architecture to nothing more than an application of comfort. An office that doesn’t coddle us at every turn can instead become a training ground for resilience, a catalyst for confrontation, fertile ground for the kind of conflict that sparks new ideas.
This is not about giving up on function, but about opening up to creative tension. Accepting that space doesn’t fully belong to us, that it’s something we must dialogue with, even clash with, means restoring its dignity and depth. Because it’s from confrontation that the most radical transformations are born.
The map is not the territory… but it helps
Gregory Bateson, father of systems thinking, once said: “the map is not the territory.” And yet, without maps, we get lost. Even if it doesn’t coincide with reality, a map, by definition, is what allows us to read it, interpret it, and move within it with awareness. At Altis, our work is not just about designing aesthetically pleasing offices. It’s about building tools that help people navigate an increasingly complex space, made up of people, behaviours, rules, budgets, emotions…
“Consult–Design–Deliver”: the Altis step-by-step method. A method that doesn’t stop at “the project,” but accompanies the client from listening all the way to delivery, with one clear belief: if you truly want to transform a workplace, a rendering alone won’t cut it. You need intelligent, accessible, rigorous mapping.

Systems thinking: first understand how it works, then decide what to do
Every workplace is a living ecosystem. There is no such thing as isolated change: shift the layout and the flows will change; change the flows and behaviours will change; change behaviours and performance, costs and even company culture will shift. That’s the domino effect of contemporary work. That’s why we always begin with a systemic reading. Asking only “how many square metres do you need?” is reductive, epistemologically inaccurate, as Bateson himself might put it.
Phase 1: CONSULT — Observing the territory
The Consult phase is our exploration of the territory, where we gather data. Kick-off and Needs Analysis frame the challenges and opportunities. The Occupancy Study tells us who uses what, when, and how. With Rapid Prototyping, we test small-scale solutions to validate large-scale ones. And with the Building Analysis & Test-Fit we understand what is truly feasible, respecting every technical and regulatory constraint. It all converges into the Business Case, not the usual document, but a compass: it shows where it makes sense to invest, where to cut back, and how to distribute resources intelligently.
Phase 2: DESIGN — Drawing the map, shaping behaviours
Design is not about making a space “beautiful”: it’s about nudging desired behaviours. Concept Design translates values and objectives into concrete guidelines. Design Development refines those choices, while Technical Design makes them ready for construction. Furniture isn’t scenery: it’s a functional tool that guides everyday practices. In parallel, Progressive Budgeting makes the cost evolution transparent: no final shocks, just progressively measured choices. Finally, the Contract clearly defines agreements: budget, timing, responsibilities. At this point the map is ready, detailed and operational: not a utopia, but a working document balancing aesthetics, function, and economic sustainability.
Phase 3: DELIVER — From construction to people (with constant control)
Deliver is the phase where the map guides the building of the new territory. Here it’s not enough to “build well”: continuous monitoring and the ability to manage complexity are essential. Permits, procurement, safety, construction, move logistics: every step is tracked with progressive cost control, allowing immediate intervention in case of deviations. And then there’s the often-overlooked issue: Change Management. Because spaces don’t change anything if people don’t inhabit them differently. Communicating, guiding, listening: these are design levers just as much as a partition wall or a height-adjustable desk.
Does it work? The data says yes.
The Altis method works because it breaks the traditional “silo” model: consultants handing things over to designers, who hand them over to procurement, who then pass them on to the general contractor. Each handover wastes time, information, and control. We unify everything in an end-to-end process, where the data gathered during analysis remains alive until final delivery. The result is measurable: timelines reduced by up to 25%, budgets respected, fewer risks. But above all, projects that make sense not only on paper, but in the daily life of the people who inhabit them.
The Altis method was created to guide complexity: listening, shaping, testing, delivering. One step at a time, with people at the centre. If you want to see our map applied to your own territory, write to us at: [email protected]
Architects for summers: 5 masters to pack for your lazy days
Some pack romance novels. Others go for thrillers or crossword puzzles. We packed five architects. No technical manuals, we promise. Just a bit of forma mentis to slip in between your beach towel and SPF 50. Zaha Hadid, Frank Lloyd Wright, Renzo Piano, Tadao Ando and Bjarke Ingels: they may not sound like a summer band, but in their own way, each of them has reimagined how we live and shape space. After all, isn’t summer a kind of life sketch with fewer constraints and more natural light?

Zaha Hadid: getting it wrong, beautifully
No ruler. No symmetry. Just curves, fluid tensions, and a touch of creative chaos. Zaha Hadid taught us that you can be radical and glamorous, off-balance and monumental. Her buildings seem to surf the asphalt, driven by a visionary stubbornness that bent concrete, software and prejudice alike. Here’s your takeaway: imperfection can be a signature. And every sharp corner might be hiding a brilliant idea.

Frank Lloyd Wright: making room for nature
The waterfall house, the floor that “follows” the landscape, the vanishing walls. Wright didn’t build on nature, but with it. He designed the first truly modern home and let it breathe in the woods. Because the environment isn’t a backdrop. It’s a co-star. Ignore it, and sooner or later it’ll come knocking, even on your energy bill.

Renzo Piano: balance, modularity and patience
The man who put wheels on museums (Pompidou) and lightness into concrete (Centro Botín). Renzo Piano is the master of the invisible detail, of technology that hides in plain sight, of architecture as poetic engineering. As he shows us, the perfect design is the one that looks effortless, but took twenty-five prototypes to get right.

Tadao Ando: silence in reinforced concrete
Former boxer, self-taught architect, minimalist poet. Tadao Ando sculpts light more than he builds structures. He gave concrete a sense of spirituality, creating temples of emptiness and calm. Let’s not beat around the bush: sometimes, subtracting is the only way to bring out the essence. (And yes, that goes for silencing your notifications too.)

Bjarke Ingels: the LEGO-loving starchitect
An artificial mountain, a ski slope on a residential block, a panda-shaped masterplan, nothing’s too far-fetched for BIG (Bjarke Ingels Group). Ingels blends ecology, humour and marketing without blinking. He knows the future is built with leisure in mind. After all, if sustainability isn’t fun, it won’t stick. And a touch of humour is often the secret ingredient in any great design.

In the end, we all know: architecture is everywhere. Even under your beach umbrella, somewhere between a granita, a sandcastle and a sideways thought. And these five masters remind us that design isn’t (only) about building. It’s about choosing how we want to live, even in August.












